PDA

View Full Version : Tourists help keep poachers away from tiger reserves



Ranbir Mahapatra
06-05-2010, 07:28 AM
A recent article on TOI
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIH/2010/05/06&PageLabel=11&EntityId=Ar01101&ViewMode=HTML&GZ=T

Himanshi Dhawan | TNN

New Delhi: Opposing the ban on tourists from core regions of tiger reserves proposed by the environment ministry, Travel Operators for Tigers (TOFT) — a campaign spearheaded by international and national travel operators — has said that wildlife tourism, on the contrary, was saving forests and tigers. The organization added that tourism ensured better security for tigers, and was the best anti-poaching mechanism even as it made forest personnel “highly and often uncomfortably accountable”.
TOFT chairman Julian Mathew said the agency would take up the issue with the ministries of tourism and environment to ensure better implementation of rules and regulations, adding that a ban on wildlife tourism was not the answer.
According to recent statistics, tiger numbers have come down from an estimated 3,642 in 2002 to 1,411 in February 2008. Experts say that actual numbers could be even lower. A recent tourism ministry study had shown that nearly 70% of resorts outside Corbett National Park were venues for weddings and parties rather than eco-tourism.
In a statement, TOFT pointed out that despite poor tourism practises being followed in the national park, it continued to be the “most visited” park in India and still had the highest number of tigers. It added that Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve had the heaviest density of tigers in its main Tala tourism zone and received 45,000 visits a year. “When sub-adults leave this tourist zone seeking their own ranges in buffer zone forests, they get lost, poached or poisoned. Ranthambhore, with its 450 sq km and estimated 35-38 tigers, finds 22-23 (two-thirds) tigers in ranges that fall within the much smaller 130 sq km of the tourism zone. These facts suggest that the best tiger security and habitat exist in tourism zones, and tigers and prey sense it,” the statement said.
Highlighting the fact that good tourism practises not only provide a means of legitimate livelihood to people living in and around tiger reserves, TOFT said if it were not for tourism bringing economic value to the forest area, it would be sacrificed for mining, farming or industry.
Emphasizing that the alternative was to ensure implementation of rules and regulations, Mathew gave the instance of Madhya Pradesh’s ecosensitive zone regulations that have been stuck in the Supreme Court since 2006. “Tiger tourism is the best antipoaching unit, operating vehicles watching for eight hours a day, deflecting poachers, loggers and grazers from being there,” Mathew said

Sabyasachi Patra
07-05-2010, 09:03 PM
I am not surprised by the sound bites from the tourism lobby. The tourism in India is a joke. Their sum total contribution towards conservation is negative.

Let these pictures tell you the story. This image is from Ranthambhore. Photographed on 25th April 2010. This tigress was trying to stalk, but tourist vehicles moved in to stop her path. She had to sit down. Till the closing time of the park, photographers had lined up blocking her path.

The previous day, a tourist vehicle even screeched to a halt and the vehicle hit her tail. It could have been fatal as well. The well behaved lady that she is, the tigress moved aside and looked at the driver for sometime and then walked away.

Sabyasachi

Sabyasachi Patra
07-05-2010, 09:15 PM
This tigress has been collared. No idea why they need to collar a tigress in a zone where she is sighted everyday. No researcher actively monitors her.

This tigress has got accustomed to tourist vehicles as she has been sighting tourist vehicles from a very impressionable age.

She was moving along the road, and the tourist vehicles were moving running amok, to give their photographers a good angle to shoot. I was watching this tigress and she had come to the road. Suddenly comes a gypsy and screeches to a halt and hits the tail of the tiger. The tigress jerks and jumps aside. She then turns around and looks at the driver. The foreigner gets scared and gets up from the seat. Unfortunately, I was not filming, so don't have proof of the impact.

If this is how the tourism lobby is saving the tiger, then I have nothing more to say.

Sabyasachi

Mohan Raj
09-05-2010, 04:56 PM
“Tiger tourism is the best antipoaching unit, operating vehicles watching for eight hours a day, deflecting poachers, loggers and grazers from being there,” Mathew said

Mathew is correct for only eight hours. What about the next 16 hours? Poachers get information on tiger moments from tourists and tour operators. I feel tourism (unregulated) cannot be the answer for poaching.