w w w . i n d i a w i l d s . c o m
home
about Sabyasachi Patra
diary
forums
image gallery
contact IndiaWilds
Home
About
Diary
Forums
Gallery
ContactUs

User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Grey Headed Fish Eagle

  1. #1
    Join Date
    30-10-13
    Posts
    66
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Grey Headed Fish Eagle

    This raptor can be easily found in somewhat larger water bodies such as lakes, rivers, swamps etc for fishes. And hence, the name. It also feeds on reptiles and minuscule mammals as well.

    This image was taken in one of the buffer zones in Tadoba.

    Aperture: 5.6f
    Shutter Speed: 1/3200s
    ISO: 400
    exp comp: -2/3ev
    WB: 9000K
    Focal length: 100mm
    Aperture priority
    Hand held.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    14-04-13
    Location
    Dubai, UAE
    Posts
    808
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like the habitat composition

  3. #3
    Join Date
    24-11-08
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    16,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lovely scape. Maybe you can place the tree a bit more to the left. Thanks for sharing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    24-11-08
    Location
    New Delhi
    Posts
    16,593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    This image with a dramatic sky would have looked even better. At the moment the sky is bland, so reducing the sky in the composition would be better.

    Lowering the camera would have resulted in different point of view with the eagle appearing high up. The ibis is on the left of the frame. It would have been very nice if the ibis would have been on the right. That would have also forced our attention to the ground due to the white colour of the ibis. At the moment the ibis is on the left and behind the tree the eagle is perched. So I agree with Mrudul that less space on the left would have been better.

    In this image you have used a 1/3200 shutter speed. That was not required. Instead, narrowing the aperture from f5.6 to f9/f11 would have been better in ensuring a higher depth of field. Thanks for sharing.

    Cheers,
    Sabyasachi

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •