Normally back of an animal is never posted.The eyes are important in a photograph and that is missing here. I am posting this just for a different perspective!
Canon 80D,Canon 100-400 IS II USM,f5.6,1/100,ISO 320 at 250mm
Regards
V S Sankar
w
w w . i n d i a w i l d s . c o m
|
|||||||
Normally back of an animal is never posted.The eyes are important in a photograph and that is missing here. I am posting this just for a different perspective!
Canon 80D,Canon 100-400 IS II USM,f5.6,1/100,ISO 320 at 250mm
Regards
V S Sankar
V S Sankar
www.keralawilds.blogspot.com
With such a close up you are just guiding attention to the hind side of the tiger. Shooting wider and without crop would have shown more of the habitat and may have made more sense.
Cheers,
Sabyasachi
Agree the tiger is in a beautiful grassland habitat, so a wider frame showing more of the habitat would have have strengthened the composition further. Thanks for sharing. Look forward to more.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks