At f2.8 the depth of field would obviously be low. The image looks a bit soft. Your name because of the positioning, font and size takes away attention from the tiger.
Cheers,
Sabyasachi
w
w w . i n d i a w i l d s . c o m
|
w
w w . i n d i a w i l d s . c o m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publisher
At f2.8 the depth of field would obviously be low. The image looks a bit soft. Your name because of the positioning, font and size takes away attention from the tiger.
Cheers,
Sabyasachi
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks