The Supreme Court is about to decide the fate of tourism in core areas of TR's tomorrow. Should core areas be completely "out of bounds" for everybody but forest department staff and scientists,or do you think tourism,in its present form,is an essential conservation tool. Or are you in favour of strict curbs on tourism,if so,please specify how tourism can help wildlife more. As we all know in places like Corbett,private resorts have encroached upon prime wildlife habitat. On the other hand,if tourists are not allowed,the FD might be easily able to cover up mismanagement. Have your say
Bookmarks