w w w . i n d i a w i l d s . c o m
home
about Sabyasachi Patra
diary
forums
image gallery
contact IndiaWilds
Home
About
Diary
Forums
Gallery
ContactUs

User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Juvenile Painted Stork

  1. #1
    Join Date
    24-11-08
    Location
    New Delhi
    Posts
    16,594
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default Juvenile Painted Stork

    This juvenile painted stork was about to land when I photographed it.

    Canon EOS 1D Mark IV, Canon EF 400mm f2.8 L IS USM, ISO 200, 1/640, f3.2, EV: +1/3, full frame image.

    Cheers,
    Sabyasachi
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    24-11-08
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    16,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Beautiful pose captured. The low angle enhances the image. The green background looks good. Thanks for sharing.
    Regards,
    Mrudul Godbole

  3. #3
    Join Date
    15-04-09
    Location
    Goa/Mumbai
    Posts
    3,121
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Great capture. The green BG looks good. Wish the water had fewer highlights, but of course that is not something you could have helped. Overall a lovely image.
    Wondering how f3.2 was sufficient here... ?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    17-12-08
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    4,589
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like the composition and the limited DOF. Some more space on the left would have been great. Thanks for sharing.
    Regards,
    Bibhav Behera
    www.bibhavbehera.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    15-04-09
    Location
    Thane, Maharashtra
    Posts
    452
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Shot at the moment, nice angle.

    Can be cropped more to get closer view.

    EV at 0.3/0.7 would decrease destructing highlights of water?
    But then you might need to compromise with details on wings.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sagar Patil,
    Thane

  6. #6
    Join Date
    24-11-08
    Location
    New Delhi
    Posts
    16,594
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Abhishek,
    It is based on the distance and focal length as well. The camera reading says the subject distance was 49.70 meters. In this case I was using the 400mm without the converter. At f3.2 and 49.7 meters the depth of field is 1.85m. So you get the coverage of the bird.

    On hindsight, I feel f4 would have been even better as I would have got 2.33m depth of field. Remember, I estimated and clicked and the estimation was purely on the basis of my understanding of this lens. I didn't have time to press the dof preview button in the camera.

    Cheers,
    Sabyasachi

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •